For our OCPD & Anger discussion I revisited “Atlas of the Heart”, one of my favorite resources on emotions, to see what it had to say about anger. You can read that rather long section below to a get a sense of anger functions. Following that is an AI generated summary of how OCPD might influence the way we experience and process anger. I’m curious to hear which parts resonate and what still feels lacking!
Atlas of the Heart by Brené Brown
https://brenebrown.com/book/atlas-of-the-heart
#12 – Places We Go When We Feel Wronged
Anger, Contempt, Disgust, Dehumanization, Hate, Self-Righteousness Anger
If you look across the research, you learn that anger is an emotion that we feel when something gets in the way of a desired outcome or when we believe there’s a violation of the way things should be. When we feel anger, we believe that someone or something else is to blame for an unfair or unjust situation, and that something can be done to resolve the problem.
Anger is an action emotion—we want to do something when we feel it and when we’re on the receiving end of it. Additionally, according to Charles Spielberger, an influential anger researcher, angry feelings can vary in intensity, “from mild irritation or annoyance to fury and rage.”
Anger is also a full-contact emotion. Because it activates our nervous system and can hijack our thoughts and behaviors, it can take a real toll on our mental and physical health. Researchers explain that regulating and coping with anger rather than holding on to or expressing chronic anger is crucial for the health of our brain (it reduces psychiatric problems) and other organs in the body. There is also an interesting biological component to anger. A substantial amount of research indicates that our propensity for anger and aggression is partially hereditary, but the specific gene locations have not yet been identified.
What I’ve Learned, Unlearned, and Continue to Learn About Anger. Dammit.
I’ve spent a lot of my career saying that anger is a secondary or “indicator” emotion that often conceals emotions that are harder to recognize, name, or own. According to 91 percent of emotions experts, I’m wrong. Yes, 91 percent of emotions experts believe that anger is a primary emotion. Maybe it’s semantics and our differences come down to how we define “primary.” Or maybe I’ve got it (and had it) all wrong. Honestly, there are a lot of debates in the research that I don’t think are worth digging into because they don’t teach us much, but this debate is worth understanding.
As I mentioned in the introduction, we asked around seventy-five hundred people to identify all of the emotions that they could recognize and name when they’re experiencing them. The average was three: glad, sad, and mad—or, as they were more often written, happy, sad, and pissed off. Couple this extremely limited vocabulary with the importance of emotional literacy, and you basically have a crisis. It’s this crisis that I’m trying to help address in this book.
Over the past two decades, when research participants talked about being angry, the story never stopped there. Their narratives of anger unfolded into stories of betrayal, fear, grief, injustice, shame, vulnerability, and other emotions. Ultimately the combination of data showing how limited emotional vocabularies can be with our experiences of interviewing people about anger and watching them consistently reveal other emotions behind the anger led me to challenge the idea that anger is a primary emotion.
The more data we collected, including interviews with more than fifteen hundred therapists and counselors, the more certain I became that anger is a secondary or “indicator” emotion that can mask or make us unaware of other feelings that are out of reach in terms of language, or that are much more difficult to talk about than anger. We live in a world where it’s much easier to say “I’m so pissed off” than “I feel so betrayed and hurt.” It’s even easier to say “I’m angry with myself” than “I’m disappointed with how I showed up.”
Clinicians and educators use many tools to help clients and students uncover the emotions that show up as anger. I think these are especially helpful:
Even if you look at the list of eighty-seven emotions and experiences in this book, more than twenty of them are likely to present as anger or with anger. Feeling increasingly confident that anger is a secondary or indicator emotion, I was left with some big questions to answer: In the face of injustice, can we just be enraged, furious, angry? Does it have to be masking or indicating something, or can we just be mad? The answer to both of these questions is yes, and…
As a former union organizer and lifelong activist, I think anger is often the most compassionate response to experiencing or witnessing injustice. It can be a powerful catalyst for change that doesn’t need to be explained or justified. And I still think that behind the anger is a tempest of pain, grief, betrayal, disappointment, and other emotions.
In Braving the Wilderness, I write about pain, hate, and anger—especially as they pertain to social justice issues. I’m going to share an excerpt with you here:
Sometimes owning our pain and bearing witness to struggle means getting angry. When we deny ourselves the right to be angry, we deny our pain. There are a lot of coded shame messages in the rhetoric of “Why so hostile?” “Don’t get hysterical,” “I’m sensing so much anger!” and “Don’t take it so personally.” All of these responses are normally code for Your emotion or opinion is making me uncomfortable or Suck it up and stay quiet.
One response to this is “Get angry and stay angry!” I haven’t seen that advice borne out in the research. What I’ve found is that, yes, we all have the right and need to feel and own our anger. It’s an important human experience. And it’s critical to recognize that maintaining any level of rage, anger, or contempt (that favorite concoction of a little anger and a little disgust) over a long period of time is not sustainable.
Anger is a catalyst. Holding on to it will make us exhausted and sick. Internalizing anger will take away our joy and spirit; externalizing anger will make us less effective in our attempts to create change and forge connection. It’s an emotion that we need to transform into something life-giving: courage, love, change, compassion, justice.
Or sometimes anger can mask a far more difficult emotion like grief, regret, or shame, and we need to use it to dig into what we’re really feeling. Either way, anger is a powerful catalyst but a life-sucking companion.
So, do I think anger is a primary emotion or not? I don’t know. There are so many competing lists of “primary emotions,” I don’t know if it matters whether anger belongs on one of those lists. Here are the three things I do know from the work I’ve done over the past twenty-plus years:
- Anger often masks emotions that are more difficult to name and/or more difficult to own.
- Just as an indicator light in our car tells us to pull over and check things out, anger is a very effective emotional indicator light that tells us to pull over and check things out.
- Anger, in response to experiencing or witnessing injustice, pain, and struggle, can be a powerful catalyst for change. But, by definition, a catalyst sparks change, it’s not the change.
Google Gemini Summary
Prompt: How might OCPD affect the way someone experiences and processes the emotion of anger?
Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) is fundamentally defined by a preoccupation with orderliness, perfectionism, and control. When anger enters the equation, it is rarely expressed as a simple, cathartic outburst. Instead, the OCPD experience of anger is a complex intersection of moral rigidity, suppressed impulses, and “rational” indignation.
The Cognitive Filter: Anger as “Righteousness”
For most people, anger is a primary emotion triggered by hurt or frustration. For someone with OCPD, anger is often filtered through a lens of moral or procedural correctness. They may not feel they are “angry” so much as they are “correcting an error.”
When a colleague misses a deadline or a partner loads the dishwasher “incorrectly,” the person with OCPD doesn’t just feel annoyed; they feel a sense of moral violation. Because they hold themselves to impossibly high standards, they expect the same from the world. Consequently, their anger feels justified and “logical,” which makes it much harder to de-escalate.
The Suppression-Explosion Cycle
One of the most distinct aspects of OCPD is the high value placed on emotional self-control. To the OCPD mind, losing one’s temper is a sign of weakness or a “lapse in the system.”
- Tight Control: Initially, anger is tightly bottled. It may manifest as jaw-clenching, stiff body language, or overly formal speech.
- Leakage: Since the anger cannot be expressed directly (as that would be “improper”), it leaks out as passive-aggression, stubbornness, or relentless “correcting” of others.
- The Breaking Point: When the internal pressure becomes too great, the individual may experience a “moral explosion.” This isn’t just a tantrum; it is a detailed, exhaustive list of every grievance and rule-breaking the other person has committed over a long period.
Rumination and the “Internal Courtroom”
A typical person might get cut off in traffic, yell a few choice words, and forget about it ten minutes later. A person with OCPD is more likely to ruminate.
They replay the event in an internal “courtroom,” building a legalistic case against the offender. They process the anger by analyzing why the other person was wrong, what rule was broken, and how the world is descending into chaos because people lack discipline. This cognitive processing keeps the physiological arousal of anger active for much longer than average, leading to chronic irritability.
Anger Directed Inward: The Inner Critic
Perhaps the most painful difference is how anger is processed when the individual fails to meet their own standards. When a person with OCPD makes a mistake, the resulting anger is turned inward with devastating precision.
While a typical person might feel “bummed out,” the OCPD individual experiences intense self-loathing. This internal anger is processed as a need for more work, more lists, and more restriction. It isn’t a feeling to be comforted; it’s a failure to be punished.
Interaction with Authority and Subordinates
The processing of anger also shifts based on social hierarchy:
- Toward Authority: Anger is usually suppressed out of a desire to be the “perfect” subordinate, often leading to deep-seated resentment and “malicious compliance.”
- Toward Subordinates/Peers: Anger is processed as pedagogical frustration. They feel it is their duty to “fix” the person, leading to micro-management that the OCPD individual views as helpful, but the recipient experiences as hostile.
In summary, where typical anger is an emotional wave, OCPD anger is a bureaucratic fire. It is fueled by a rigid sense of “should,” processed through obsessive rumination, and expressed through the conviction that one is not being “mean,” but merely upholding the standards of a world that is otherwise falling apart.
![[Zoom Meeting] OCPD & Disgust 🤢](https://www.youmeandocpd.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2023-12-14-OCPD-Disgust-1024x536.jpg)
![[Zoom Meeting] Reflecting on the Year 2023 📝🔍](https://www.youmeandocpd.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2023-12-28-OCPD-Reflecting-on-the-Year-1024x536.jpg)